Talk:National Creation
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
the party is right wing, not far right
editThe party is right-wing, not far-right — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexispapp (talk • contribs) 23:15, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
I am involved in the party and I know some members and staff personally, they're not far right, it ranges from centre right classical-liberals (disappointed with ND on economics and social issues) to right wing national conservatives. Alexispapp (talk) 23:20, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Conflict of Interest
editHere we have the clear admission by Alexispapp [1], that they are associated with the party. Therefore, their contributions are questionable and should be closely monitored. For now they are reverting cited content about the party's ideology [2] - please, provide assistance. NikolaosFanaris (talk) 23:21, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The party is not far right and every moderate political scientist would say so, don't label us as far-right, I am not directly involved in the party, I just personally know numerous members Alexispapp (talk) 23:25, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Party ideology
editThe party is a conservative (debatable whether it is a national conservative) and classical liberal party with emphasis on liberal laissez-faire economics. Please mention both social and economic ideology of the party. Alexispapp (talk) 23:28, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Please Reach Consensus.
editMy suggestion is that editors should reach consensus before labeling the party as right wing or far right. For now I am going to edit the page to just say "a political party". Again this should not be changed until there is consensus in either camp.Taxin609 (Talk To Me) 23:31, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
ok but saying far right is a travesty of an exaggeration in my opinion, how is the Elliniki lisi party right wing ro far right and National Creation far right, no way. National creation is just a classical liberal alternative to ND, nothing else. Alexispapp (talk) 23:37, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Also the other editor has constantly made anti-right wing edits, not very moderate huh? Alexispapp (talk) 23:38, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
- Reminder: edits needs to be backed up with reliable sources, and ideally sources independent of the subject. —C.Fred (talk) 23:44, 26 May 2022 (UTC)