Talk:National Defense Education Act

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Michael Powerhouse in topic wording style

Untitled

edit

Looks like text was taken from http://www.bartleby.com/65/na/NatlDefe.html 69.47.185.144 19:29, 27 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Why does this article link at the top to nitrosamine? What has that got to do with this US Congressional legislation? HuronKing, September 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.233.86.217 (talk) 00:14, 18 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

major edits 5-10-09

edit

I edited this page based on a 1982 dissertation written on the subject. For those with subscriptions, it is available through Proquest dissertations.--Schwegles (talk) 01:08, 11 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

This article gives too much weight to "affidavit disclaiming belief in the overthrow of the U.S. government." That is important, but I would like to see more on success measurements, any implications of long -term impacts, if any evaluations were attempted.

dladwigj 16 Jan 2010.

wording style

edit

I feel that the article's subject matter should be explained more simply. The wording is a bit unnatural sounding. The sentences seem to be unnecessarily long. I'll take a stab at simplifying the article, while still capturing the original content. Michael Powerhouse (talk) 21:26, 30 November 2015 (UTC)Reply