Talk:National Model Railroad Association

Trains: Transport modelling Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the Rail transport modelling task force.

Tennessee Low‑importance

	Tennessee portal National Model Railroad Association is within the scope of WikiProject Tennessee, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Tennessee and related subjects in the Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, and even become a member. [Project Articles] • [Project Page] • [Project Talk] • [Assessment] • [Template Usage]TennesseeWikipedia:WikiProject TennesseeTemplate:WikiProject TennesseeTennessee articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I'd like to help remove some of the 'citation needed' annotations in the standards area of the article, but in most cases I'm at a loss as to how to go about substantiating these claims (the veracity of which are largely indisputable in the mind of most anyone associated with the model railroading hobby). NMRA has had a 'product conformance program' for decades; in the beginning it was a big deal and empirics suggests that it was key in bringing most manufacturers to a common level of rolling stock interoperability. But as far as I know, there's no principal, citeable source to support this 'fact'.

On the other hand, I'd argue that the somewhat patronizing comparisons to British and NEM standards should be removed from the article as they lend nothing positive to the discussion.

Blbachman (talk) 20:41, 23 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Yes the part about a citation needed for the nmra library moving to CA. Might as well need to site that the sky is blue. It is moving and everyone (that cares) knows it. Russ The Rail Guy 19:38, 20 August 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Railguyruss (talk • contribs)

Sections

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've added the section titles as a mean to provide better linking to this article. Granted, this article could be improved significantly, but the sections help provide a framework. --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 18:20, 8 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic