 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Untitled
editI removed the Foetry accusation from the introduction at the top of the page but left the link to Foetry.com at the bottom. Here's my reasoning - that Foetry accused the National Poetry Series of misdeeds is certainly factual. That is to say, it happened. However, the mere fact that Foetry leveled an accusation is not in and of itself notable. More importantly, its placement in the introduction gives this view undue weight. While some of the charges leveled by Foetry turned out to be true (see the Foetry.com WP entry for examples of "successful campaigns"), I see no independently-verified evidence of the charges against the NPS. The suggestion of impropriety may be of interest to the casual reader, and so I've left the external link to the Foetry.com website at the bottom of the page. ProfJeFF (talk) 15:52, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Agreed Bluehole (talk) 23:57, 12 December 2007 (UTC)