Talk:National Railway Company of Cuba

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Sammy D III in topic Rolling stock table

New locomotives

edit

About 1979, when I was working for Montreal Locomotive Works, MLW supplied a small batch of locos to Ferrocarriles de Cuba. I have to dig for all the details. Peter Horn User talk 22:25, 5 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

GM-900 locos

edit

Hi,

a short question about the roster table data. Which sort of locomotives does "GM-900" mean - any 900 hp class? I could'nt find anything about it. -- Würfeltier (talk) 06:12, 13 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

The number of these locos matches with the number of GM EMD G8, which were supplied to Consolidated Ry of Cuba - found here: http://www.trainweb.org/emdloco/index.html. And what's with the 21 unnamed GM EMD-locos in the 6th row? Can someone check this please. -- Würfeltier (talk) 21:00, 21 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ferrocarriles de Cuba. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:33, 13 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ferrocarriles de Cuba. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:26, 30 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Rolling stock table

edit

Power/wheels or Passengers fit in Notes? Most sources have both kW and hp, I only converted if source only had one.

Does Model have any order top to bottom?

I put them in order of when they came to Cuba, not when they were built.

I have been using sites with content as refs, most mention Cuba.

I have been adding pics of locos outside Cuba saying "Similar to..."

Thank you. Sammy D III (talk) 18:41, 18 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Other stuff

edit

I changed to all US English, it was sort of mixed. I hope that isn't US-centric. I also took out a political blurb from Pre-revolutionary. Small grammar fixes (I'm not good myself). Thank you. Sammy D III (talk) 02:50, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply