Talk:National Review (London)
Latest comment: 17 years ago by Crosbiesmith in topic National Review as Unitarian?
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
National Review as Unitarian?
editThe article Reaction to Darwin's theory references "The review in the British Unitarian National Review". National Review (London) makes no reference to Unitarianism. Would it be logical to include some such reference? -- 201.19.11.75 12:03, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
- That was a different National Review, published between 1855 and 1864, and edited by Walter Bagehot and Richard Holt Hutton. - Crosbiesmith 19:11, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
- I created National Review (1855), a particularly stubby stub, to avoid future confusion. - Crosbiesmith 19:25, 7 August 2007 (UTC)