Talk:National Supervisory Commission
Latest comment: 4 years ago by BegbertBiggs in topic Requested move 8 October 2020
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the National Supervisory Commission article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of National Supervisory Commission be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. Wikipedians in Beijing may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
 | A news item involving National Supervisory Commission was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 9 October 2018. |  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Requested move 8 October 2020
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: No consensus (non-admin closure) BegbertBiggs (talk) 16:51, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
National Supervisory Commission → National Commission of Supervision – This is the name stated in their constitution [1] [2] Mike Rohsopht (talk) 06:17, 8 October 2020 (UTC) —Relisting. BegbertBiggs (talk) 21:22, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support per nom. – DarkGlow (talk) 15:22, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose while it may be the official name, it looks like more sources use the current name. Usually we go with the common name rather than WP:OFFICIALNAME. (t · c) buidhe 21:52, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose I do not know Chinese, but there exists high possibility that all translations used in sources (I have also seen form National Supervision Commission) are grammaticaly correct. Therefore, usage of the form: "National Supervisory Commission", as the widest-spread one, in the title, as well as in the rest of the article, is definitely unquestionable. Deditus Particulo Write to me 22:17, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.