Talk:National and Local Government Officers' Association

	Organized Labour portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Title of union

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've changed the text to reflect the fact that the full name of NALGO changed in 1952 from National Association of Local Government Officers to the National And Local Government Officers Association. In my view the title of the article should be NALGO, as that is what the union was always known as in practice, rather than either of the full titles. Does anyone agree ? Ghmyrtle 18:24, 11 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Infobox

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Good idea to have an infobox, but under "people" I don't really see why one Gen Sec should be listed but not others. But then, do we list all of them, or does that make an unwieldy list? Are there any other criteria that should be used, in terms of notability or length of service? Ghmyrtle (talk) 23:11, 11 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic