Talk:Native Mob

Crime and Criminal Biography: Organized crime Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Organized crime task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Indigenous peoples of North America Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Minnesota Low‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

South Dakota Low‑importance

	South Dakota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Dakota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of South Dakota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South DakotaWikipedia:WikiProject South DakotaTemplate:WikiProject South DakotaSouth Dakota articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: North Dakota Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	North Dakota portal This article is supported by WikiProject North Dakota.

Wisconsin Low‑importance

	Wisconsin portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Do you think is okay to say that they terrorized the communities they were in? Logsta (talk) 19:12, 28 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Gang Assessment

Latest comment: 3 years ago10 comments2 people in discussion

I have done my research enough to know that the supposed “4/20/1738 National Gang Threat Assessment” doesn’t exist. RelatedToMarioPrayer (talk) 08:57, 9 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

No, but if you did a little more research, you'd know that the National Gang Threat Assessment is a real thing. [1]. It doesn't say what the writer claimed, so I removed it, but the source is a good one. Niteshift36 (talk) 19:13, 9 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

I’m not an idiot. I know the National Gang Threat Assessment exists, just not 4/20/1738. That is just trolling. RelatedToMarioPrayer (talk) 22:12, 9 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

So then remove the trolling. Oh wait, I already did. Niteshift36 (talk) 14:23, 10 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

You’re a wise ass. Learn to fix your attitude or you’re gonna get slumped by the wrong person. RelatedToMarioPrayer (talk) 13:23, 12 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sure thing tough guy. I'll worry about getting "slumped" (or another ridiculous flavor of the month term) Niteshift36 (talk) 18:23, 12 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

You’re pathetic. I feel bad for your kids. Sitting on Wikipedia everyday, shitting on everyone for no reason whatsoever. Being a sarcastic dumbass is not going to help you succeed in life. Implying I’m dumb for what reason, just because you can’t get your teeth knocked out over a screen and you feel superior? RelatedToMarioPrayer (talk) 06:18, 14 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Oh, I am so wounded by your harsh assessment. This could have all been avoided if you had simply removed what was clearly trolling. Instead, you come to the talk page and start chest thuping about how you've 'done enough research'. Just quietly remove it, click and move on. If someone contests it, then discuss it. There was nothing controversial about removing obvious vandalism. Thousands of editors make small edits quietly, every day, without having to announce it.Niteshift36 (talk) 15:34, 15 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

You call that chest thumping? 😂 Whatever you say, pal. RelatedToMarioPrayer (talk) 08:54, 18 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Chest thumping. Self-aggrandizing. Pick a phrase you are comfortable with. In the end, it was obvious trolling that wouldn't need discussion, but the discussion didn't need to start with how much reasearch you've done. Niteshift36 (talk) 16:55, 18 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic