Talk:Natural Selection (The Spectacular Spider-Man)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Natural Selection (The Spectacular Spider-Man) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Natural Selection (The Spectacular Spider-Man) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 2, 2009. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that critics praised The Spectacular Spider-Man episode "Natural Selection" for its action and fight sequences? |
GA Review
edit- This review is transcluded from Talk:Natural Selection (The Spectacular Spider-Man)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: maclean (talk) 17:56, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- GA review (see Wikipedia:What is a good article?)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Notes
- help clean up from the previous battle with Eddie. - wasn't the damage from the battle with Electro?
- It was, but he's cleaning up with Eddie. The Flash {talk} 18:35, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- is given a gene cleanser. - given by whom?
- the photos published - photos of the Lizard?
- Yup — Done The Flash {talk} 18:35, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- Two images: one Creative commons, the other is Fair Use: ok.
- There were some problems with logical quotations that I cleared up in a copyedit.
- I compared it to other the Featured Articles Interactions (The Spectacular Spider-Man) and Starvin' Marvin (South Park) for broadness.
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Natural Selection (The Spectacular Spider-Man). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090319161238/http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/4024.htm/ to http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/4024.htm/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100102105926/http://ifmagazine.com/feature.asp?article=2707 to http://www.ifmagazine.com/feature.asp?article=2707
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:29, 18 June 2017 (UTC)