Talk:Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind (film)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jionpedia (talk · contribs) 14:08, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Will review it in the next coming days. Regards, ----Jionpedia ✉ 14:08, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Comment: The biggest problem is the length of plot, which passes 700 words, and it needs to be shortened. I am giving 2 days time, and if the plot is not shortened, then I am afraid I have to fail this. Regards, --Jionpedia ✉ 16:15, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

I disgree because WP:PLOTSUMMARIZE says there is no limit on size. Also, at less than 40 words over your suggestion of 700 is not a failing issue or part of the GA criteria. The form in which it is in is already highly compressed, a difference of 40-50 words would result in a major detriment in comprehension. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 22:09, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Okay. Here are the comments:

• I am quite dissatisfied how the sections are placed, even it is not a part of the GA criteria. In my opinion, the Production section should be moved above the Themes section and merge Themes and Gliders into Production. Also move Reception below Releases.
  • "A total of 21 minutes and 50 seconds from the original production". This sentence and the source should be moved into External links. Also, replace the source with an English-language source if you find one.

This is from my side. Will pass the article after these comments have been resolved. Regards, --Jionpedia ✉ 12:26, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

The Themes and Production placement has been switched. Reception was already below Releases. The gilders and themes are not part of production. Themes is the discussion of the content and analysis of the work and are analysis of the content; it is not in any form part of the production of the film. The gilders are actually something I don't like in the article; it is not really about the movie, but it is most certainly not going into the production section - it has no ties to Ghilbi at all, much less the movie's production. Your last suggestion about moving the cuts made for the release of Warriors of the Wind to External Links doesn't even make any sense to me. Also, the source may be in German, but this is a secondary source to show, explicitly, what was removed from the movie and it goes cut by cut throughout it. There is no other source of such quality and precision on the internet and I've not seen any such analysis in any offline sources; there is no other option but to keep it because it is a valid source - Google Translate is a good option for reading though. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 23:26, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

I meant to move the Reception section below Releases and its sub-sections. Never mind, I did it.

Final analysis

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Good job. Don't get it delisted! Thanks, --Jionpedia ✉ 07:10, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Thank you! ChrisGualtieri (talk) 11:08, 25 October 2013 (UTC)