Talk:Nautilus Productions

Conflict of interest

This article was created by the owner of the company, who declared his COI today. I have asked him not to edit the article directly going forward, and have tagged the article for COI. The article needs to be reviewed for NPOV and sourcing by an independent editor before the tag can be removed. Once you review the article and remove the tag, please leave a note here. Thanks! Jytdog (talk) 13:03, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

I've made a start on reviewing this article. The author has done a decent job of keeping a neutral point of view, given his potential CoI. I've taken out one sentence per WP:REDFLAG:

• At that time in 2007, the survey and recovery of artifacts from the Mardi Gras shipwreck site, was the deepest underwater archaeology project ever attempted in the Gulf of Mexico.

I think that a claim of "the deepest .." requires an independent source. It's mentioned by Rick Allen in the first reference, but with all due respect we don't take at face value everything that folks write about themselves. I haven't yet ploughed through all 335 pages of the second reference, but a search of the document returns no matches for the word 'deepest'. If the above sentence is supported by the second ref, then I'd be grateful for the page number.

What that reference does claim that I find interesting is this: "... the Mardi Gras Shipwreck Project allowed for the refinement of deep-water archaeological excavation methods. This data recovery is one of only a few instances worldwide where an archaeological excavation has been attempted in deep water using a remotely-operated vehicle." I would think that worth mentioning in the article and I'll try to knock up a form a words when I've finished going through the article. --RexxS (talk) 18:01, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Update: the rest looks like a fair representation of the sources, so I don't see any NPOV problem. I've cleaned up the refs and checked them as best I can, so I've removed the tags. I'm now going to clean the text up by moving the full references into the References section where they belong. --RexxS (talk) 19:02, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nautilus Productions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150526172649/http://www.al.com/news/audio/flightwrap.mp3 to http://www.al.com/news/audio/flightwrap.mp3

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:38, 14 February 2018 (UTC)