Talk:Naval Base San Diego

More ships

According to a tertiary source 60 ships are based there in 2010, with 80 expected by 2014. Can't seem to find a good secondary source for this. Student7 (talk) 00:49, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

If you can see it from outside the .mil domain, the following site has all ships located in San Diego. http://www.public.navy.mil/surfor/Pages/NavyRegionSouthwestShipLocator.aspx — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.163.106.71 (talk) 19:24, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Closure

http://www.nctimes.com/news/local/military/article_ab885ae5-da91-5409-bbca-f430b2ae174d.html Mayoral hopeful DeMaio sees base closure coming

Seems like local political hype at the moment. As the farthest American base from any possible theater of deployment, San Diego has no replacement. Hcobb (talk) 14:38, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

2 More Aircraft Carriers Coming To San Diego

http://www.10news.com/news/30899333/detail.html

I'm waiting for details. Hcobb (talk) 16:46, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

And the swastika shape?

No mention of the swastika as some websites say. regards --200.75.144.221 (talk) 18:36, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Unclear as to first sentence.

The first sentence reads, ″Naval Base San Diego, sometimes called 32nd Street Naval Station, is one of the largest bases of the United States Navy in San Diego, California.″

This makes it sound like the naval base is "one of the largest of the United States Navy...IN SAN DIEGO" (i.e. That there are other naval bases in San Diego and that Naval Base San Diego is merely one of the largest ones there.)

Maybe that is intended but my guess is that it really means to say that Naval Base San Diego is "one of the largest...of the United States Navy. (i.e. That Naval Base San Diego is one of the largest bases of the United States Navy ANYWHERE.)

However, I'm not sure so I don't want to make this change myself.

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Naval Base San Diego. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090810223605/http://sandiego.ca.navyusa.org/ to http://sandiego.ca.navyusa.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:51, 14 February 2018 (UTC)