Talk:Navy SEALs (video game)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (February 2018)
Good articleNavy SEALs (video game) has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 19, 2016Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Navy SEALS (video game)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 15:54, 16 January 2016 (UTC)Reply


Will review later on or tomorrow.♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:55, 16 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

  • Perhaps change " in 1991" to "the following year" to avoid repetition in lede?
  • "Mancunian " is probably not ideal for a global audience, English should be fine.
  • " in "transforming" the British video games industry into a "real multi-national business"." -quoting looks strange here.
  • "However, the other reviewer criticised the game's hard difficulty.[11] Robert Swan of Computer and Video Games criticised the playability of the ZX Spectrum version, calling it "less playable" due to its presentation in monochrome and hard difficulty. Reviewing the GX4000 port, however, Swann praised the "colourful" graphics, however he expressed scepticism over the difficulty." -a lot of howevers!
I fixed it myself.


GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

Dr. Blofeld 17:17, 19 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

@Dr. Blofeld: thanks for the review! Sorry I had to leave this abruptly, but I've fixed the funny looking quotations now. I searched through the scans and couldn't find anything related to elevators or "lifts", as I definitely would have mentioned that in the article if they did. JAGUAR  15:28, 20 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Navy SEALS (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:17, 15 February 2018 (UTC)Reply