Talk:Ne supra crepidam

Judicaret?

Pliny actually wrote Sutor, ne ultra judicaret I gather from Google but I didn't see the point of labouring it. By all means do if you think it's worth it. Rinpoche (talk) 04:30, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Which part of Google? "Sutor, ne ultra judicaret" has your comment as the single instance of its occurance in its database. — LlywelynII 16:34, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Sutor?

I'm not sure where I read it, but isn't it also said as just "Ne ultra crepidam"? --Tristyn^⌘ 03:53, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

I mean, if you're talking directly to a shoemaker, sure. — LlywelynII 16:36, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Merger proposal

The meager content of Ultracrepidarianism should be incorporated in this article. For their polemical purposes Hazlitt and his friend coined just an adjective; the making of substantive, one among the many "-isms" is something that has to be elaborated. There is simply not enough substance for a separate article.77.85.32.26 (talk) 16:10, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Done. Ultracrepidarianism page is left for Redirect.Ael 2 (talk) 17:43, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

So... this entire article was just made up?

The form of the expression was ne supra crepidam sutor iudicaret and ultracrepidarian doesn't derive from a mangling of that expression but, as should be obvious, from the prefix ultra- and the word crepidarian. — LlywelynII 16:37, 6 July 2023 (UTC)