A fact from Neanthes arenaceodentata appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 December 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that the marine worm Neanthes arenaceodentata is both an environmental monitor and a caring father?
Neanthes arenaceodentata is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marine life, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Marine lifeWikipedia:WikiProject Marine lifeTemplate:WikiProject Marine lifeMarine life articles
Latest comment: 3 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
I like the hook, but it needs to be present in the article with an inline citation(s) so it can be verified. The article also needs to be expanded by about 300 to 400 original characters of prose. Adding in the statement above with some context will likely be enough. Great job so far! Footlessmouse (talk) 02:09, 9 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Footlessmouse: I have added an extra inline citation for the paternal care. I would have thought the environmental monitor was covered adequately by the last paragraph, but can rewrite the hook if you don't agree. I created the article and I think you will find it is plenty long enough. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:12, 9 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
Overall: New enough, long enough, neutral, inline citations are good, hook is now covered with inline citations, and is interesting. The phrase "is a species of marine polychaete worm in the family Nereididae" is present in one of the sources, but from what I can tell, that is the standard way to word it and is present in other articles in the same family. No other copyvio issues No picture. QPQ given. Great job! Footlessmouse (talk) 22:18, 9 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
I like the hook, but it needs to be present in the article with an inline citation(s) so it can be verified. The article also needs to be expanded by about 300 to 400 original characters of prose. Adding in the statement above with some context will likely be enough. Great job so far! Footlessmouse (talk) 02:09, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
New enough, long enough, neutral, inline citations are good, hook is now covered with inline citations, and is interesting. The phrase "is a species of marine polychaete worm in the family Nereididae" is present in one of the sources, but from what I can tell, that is the standard way to word it and is present in other articles in the same family. No other copyvio issues No picture. QPQ given. Great job! Footlessmouse (talk) 22:18, 9 December 2020 (UTC)