Talk:Neath and Tennant Canal/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 20:03, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

I will review. Pyrotec (talk) 20:03, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Initial comments

I've had a quick read of the article, and I believe that it should make GA-status states this time round.

I'm now working my way through the article section by section, but leaving the WP:Lead until last. This step is likely to day a day or so and this appears to be a comprehensive article. I may fix any "trivial problems" as I go through the article, and if so I might not list them here. Pyrotec (talk) 19:46, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

There was very litle that I needed to do: I added some convert templates (to satisfy the "metric poice") and a few wikilinks. Pyrotec (talk) 07:15, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Overall summary

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   Yes: with photographs taken by the Nominator.

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

I'm awarding this this article GA-status. Congratulations on producing an informative article, which (obviously) involved a previous site visit. Pyrotec (talk) 07:15, 23 April 2011 (UTC)