The article Charles "Cy" Sherman was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 23 October 2016 with a consensus to merge the content into Nebraska Cornhuskers football. If you find that such action has not been taken promptly, please consider assisting in the merger instead of re-nominating the article for deletion. To discuss the merger, please use this talk page.
Do not remove this template after completing the merger. A bot will replace it with {{afd-merged-from}}.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports articles
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Cleanup : * Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state) * Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.) * Standardize Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing. * Sport in the United Kingdom - the Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required.
* Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Latest comment: 9 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I was surprised this was still going on. The scientific consensus is against balloon releases as they significantly harm the environment and wildlife. It is a violation of NPOV to not represent this discussion in the sources regarding their practices. It has been discussed extensively in the sources about this specific subject, particularly in 2021:
The damage to wildlife such as turtles, birds, and deer who mistake the balloons for food is why the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service published a statement urging people to stop releasing balloons and also why numerous states, cities, and even countries have passed laws to ban and enforce penalties for balloons releases including Connecticut, Florida, Tennessee, and Virginia,” Woerner said. According to ASUN, UNL is the only Big Ten school along with the only university in the country that still does mass balloon releases. “The harm caused to the environment by this tradition and the impacts it has on our reputation as a University cannot be ignored any longer,” Skylar Hanson, Senior Human Resource Management major at UNL said. “There is clearly a growing consensus among students that it is time for us to part with this particular tradition,” Ivan Molina, Junior Political Science major at UNL said.[1]
The idea that this has anything to do with a helium shortage is a violation of NPOV and only represents one aspect of the practice. A bizarre 2011 article by the Daily Nebraskan strangely denied that the practice was environmentally harmful and weirdly claimed that the EPA wasn't concerned. In reality, every relevant scientific body in the world has recommended against the practice. A 2012 study by Clemson students showed that the balloons had measurable impacts on the environment that were at odds with claims that they were safe, leading to them halting the practice in 2018.[2] Two petitions were filed against the University of Nebraska, one around the time of the Clemson study and another in 2014,[3] and in 2016, they were sued for continuing the balloon release.[4]. The idea that this tradition ended because of a helium shortage is 100% unsupported and appears to be a whitewashing of all of the major opposition to balloon releases by the university over the last decade. This needs to be fixed. Viriditas (talk) 17:41, 20 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Not done: The page's protection level has changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to edit the page yourself. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. MadGuy7023 (talk) 13:32, 25 September 2022 (UTC)