Talk:Nebula Genomics
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nebula Genomics article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Relationship with BGI Group section
editSorry for my late response, User:Gsdunlap you're basically citing a primary source (Nebula FAQ section) to justify the deletion of an entire section based on three different highly quality and well-estabilished news outlets: Reuters, Washington Post and BioSpace (you can also see their evaluation on Media Bias Fact Check). So I think that text should remain, but it can be added that Nebula claims to be sequencing their samples in Europe. What do you think? --Digressivo (talk) 09:49, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Gsdunlap: I've asked twice that you please discuss this matter. I'm going to go ahead and make the change I've described above. If you revert without responding here, then I'm going to have to file a complaint against you at ANI for disruptive editing by reverting without discussing.— Digressivo (talk) 17:04, 23 May 2022 (UTC).
Controversy section
editIs there any source for the claims made in that section? Their website [1] states "We decode 100% of your DNA, not just 1% as with whole exome sequencing, providing you the most comprehensive view of your DNA." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.17.24.1 (talk) 23:59, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
- I haven't found any information either, @Spludgey could you provide a reliable source that supports that Nebula's statement controversy? Digressivo (talk) 05:46, 17 December 2023 (UTC)