Talk:Necropolis: Atlanta
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Alexandra IDV in topic GA Review
Necropolis: Atlanta has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: September 6, 2021. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Necropolis: Atlanta/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 12:54, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Comments
- Could we link cross-over play to something like Crossover (fiction)?
- That is probably the closest concept to link to. Done.--AlexandraIDV 02:32, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Larry MacDougall appears only in the infobox, not referenced anywhere.
- I had misspelled his name as McDougall in the article body. Good catch.--AlexandraIDV 02:32, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Likewise Robert Dixon.
- While we may all know what a vampire is, it may be worth linking wraith as that's lesser known.
- Fair. Linking vampire too since they appear together in the article.--AlexandraIDV 02:32, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Gen Con, I assume it was the one in Milwaukee? Our article calls it "Gen Con '94".
- Yes, that's correct. Swapped to "Gen Con '94".--AlexandraIDV 02:32, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- "going out of one's way to get a copy of" this is a bit whimsical for encyclopedia, is it a quote?
- Not a quote, but a slightly too close paraphrase. I have changed the wording to "particularly worth reading".--AlexandraIDV 02:32, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- "Computer + Videogiochi" you put the other magazines into context, can you do the same for this.
- "the Confederate" link.
- ISBNs should be all 10- or all 13-digit.
- I have followed Wikipedia:ISBN, which says
However, if an older work only lists an ISBN-10, use that in citations instead of calculating an ISBN-13 for it. This is because ISBNs are often used as search strings and checksum differences between the two forms make it difficult to find items listed only under the other type.
--AlexandraIDV 02:32, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- I have followed Wikipedia:ISBN, which says
That's all I have. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 18:33, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- @The Rambling Man: Thank you for your comments - I believe I have fixed all the issues you mentioned, except for the ISBN question, which I commented on above.--AlexandraIDV 02:36, 6 September 2021 (UTC)