Talk:Neighborhood Watch (White Collar)

Neighborhood Watch (White Collar) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 1, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

Television

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Neighborhood Watch (White Collar)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 03:53, 27 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
~~Wikilink "Third season" in the lead~~

~~Sources aren't need in the lead. I'd move [4] down to the "Ratings" section~~

~~I would break up the production section into two paragraphs, right before ""Neighborhood Watch" was written by Jeff F. King, his first writing credit..."~~

~~Do you have a citation to state who directed what? Maybe just cite the episode itself~~

~~Italicize The A.V. Club in Ref. No. 4~~
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
~~The picture in the infobox needs a better caption/rationale~~
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

On hold for seven days to straighten out the issues.--Gen. Quon (talk) 04:02, 27 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

I pass!--Gen. Quon (talk) 20:47, 1 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Neighborhood Watch (White Collar). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:29, 18 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic