This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editWhat are the third party sources cited in the text? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.68.112.75 (talk) 07:30, 15 December 2007 (UTC) "Third party" as in neutral, i.e., neither Russian or Turkish news reports: the word used was "reports", not "sources". I've added to the article the name of the writer of the quoted words. Meowy 17:42, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
yaptıkları için bütün kalbimle teşekkür ederim —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.102.56.237 (talk) 16:39, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
As to the contemporary accounts section. This sounds like revisionist history. What do you think bodies would look like after being attacked with hatchets and hand tools? When you are fighting against firearms and you only have hatchets and other hand tools, you are going to have to hack people to pieces. This section disturbed me as not being subjective to the conditions at the time of the conflict. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sjjohnso (talk • contribs) 10:38, 1 October 2016 (UTC)