This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neopaganism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neopaganism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeopaganismWikipedia:WikiProject NeopaganismTemplate:WikiProject NeopaganismNeopaganism articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago8 comments6 people in discussion
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Latest comment: 11 months ago5 comments2 people in discussion
@Alison. The article is currently full of OR and unsourced promotional info. Keeping it as is simply isn't an option. That said, if you think it merits a separate article and have time/sources to flesh it out, that would be an acceptable solution. If not I think blank-and-redirect is a good way to preserve the article's existence (and record of history) while not continuing to host un-encyclopedic content in contradiction with our policies. Tomorrow and tomorrow (talk) 23:38, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
I'll also add that this article has been tagged as lack of sources since 2017 so I feel its reasonable to say that just leaving it and hoping it improves isn't working. A blank-and-redirect allows for any searchers to be sent to the main article, and if the Neopagan section gets developed enough it can be spun out into a separate article here. Tomorrow and tomorrow (talk) 23:44, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Well, it's now significantly improved, with somewhat decent references. More tomorrow and over the weekend after I hit the books - Alisontalk05:38, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Reply