Talk:Neo-revelationism

Refs

Waiting 48 hours for an editor to put some references into this and then I'm prodding it.Simonm223 (talk) 21:44, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

the topic is in fact valid, grouping a number of people (mostly women in fact) who have claimed to be talking to Jesus directly, from medieval mystics to Uriella. But it needs a reasonable title and reasonable content, neither of which is the case here. --dab (𒁳) 10:48, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

ok, our nearest best article on this appears to be Visions of Jesus and Mary. But of course a "revelation" is not necessarily a "vision" and may also be verbal. It appears the technical term for this is interior locution. I would prefer fixing this artile over deleting it, as it has already been created, but of course it has next to no value as it stands at present. --dab (𒁳) 10:56, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

ok, I think I can fix this. It appears the correct term is neo-revelationism (or just neo-revelation). Don't prod this just yet. --dab (𒁳) 11:20, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks Dab.Simonm223 (talk) 14:04, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

wp:fringe word. No citations.

Move page FatalSubjectivities (talk) 13:34, 14 December 2022 (UTC)