Talk:Nepal house martin
(Redirected from Talk:Nepal House Martin)
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Mike Searson in topic GA Review
Nepal house martin has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- Very well written!
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Very well sourced, one of the better GA's I've read in a while.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- I learned a bit about this species I had never heard of before today, all bases are covered!
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Although I'm not a big "image guy", if you want to move this up to FAC, you might want to consider a picture of the nest in that section, a minor point, but it could help the article, the ones on Commons didn't appear High-res enough to use as a thumbnail, so I didn't add one.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall: Good job! I enjoyed doing this one!
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Reviewer: Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 00:59, 16 December 2009 (UTC)