Talk:Nepidae

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified
edit

I don't know enough about but what about this very different water scorpion mentioned here?: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4486830.stm

That link matches the one in the article (in subject) which means that the article shouldn't mention it at all. The creature the article discusses is an actual aquatic scorpion, not a 'water scorpion' water bug.

Ancient Super Scorpions???

edit

If I'm not mistaken, that section is entirely irrelevant & I'm removing it. This page deals with Nepid "Water Scorpions", which are a kind of insect. Hibbertopterid Water Scorpions were arachnids & were indeed related to terrestrial scorpions (although somewhat distantly). I will remove the section and place a link to the Eurypterids in the article. - Wyvern J. Wynderunner 01:05, 30 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Number of genera, difficult terminology, and clearer separation from real scorpions

edit

I checked ITIS, and as far as I can tell there are only three genera in Nepidae, namely Curicta, Nepa, and Ranatra, not 14 as stated in the article. Also I think the language could be simplified and that it should be made clearer that these insects have nothing but the common name and a vague similarity in common with actual scorpions. 213.112.196.179 (talk) 20:14, 8 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nepidae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:25, 15 June 2016 (UTC)Reply