Talk:Nergisî
Latest comment: 1 year ago by 2603:6000:A408:F469:1D29:3141:4A7C:1184 in topic Did you know nomination
A fact from Nergisî appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 January 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by 2603:6000:A408:F469:1D29:3141:4A7C:1184 (talk) 23:48, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
( )
- ... that after a lifetime of feeling undervalued, Nergisî gained the appreciation of the Ottoman sultan and was sent to the front as a chronicler, only to fall from his horse and die on his way? Source: TEİS
- ALT1: ... that Nergisî was "very cultured and imaginative", but no one could quite understand what he wrote? Source: Büyük Larousse and TEİS
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Embassy of the Philippines, Baghdad
- Comment: Taking a bit of a liberty with ALT1 to make it hooky.
Created by GGT (talk). Self-nominated at 01:15, 27 December 2022 (UTC).
- Thanks for creating this interesting article! I will review this until tomorrow! WatkynBassett (talk) 09:48, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
- Review:
- The article is new enough (created on 23 December 2022; nominated on 27 December 2022).
- The article is long enough (more than 1,500 characters of readable prose even before my small additions).
- The article seems free of copyvios; Earwig didnot pick up any issues.
- The article is sourced and the quality of sources seems good enough. The İslâm Ansiklopedisi is an academic encyclopaedia and "The Ottoman World" is published by a well-known academic publisher. As I was not at all familiar with either the topic or this literary field in general, I checked the content a little more than usual against the sources and discovered no issues.
- QPQ is done.
- The original hook is interesting and hooky. I prefer it much more than ALT1.
- The hook is short enough, but a little bit on the long side (190 characters).
- It is cited inline and neutral.
- Overall: I think the original hook is good to go! Thank you for creating free knowledge! WatkynBassett (talk) 12:16, 29 December 2022 (UTC)