Talk:Nernst effect

Latest comment: 7 years ago by 2001:16B8:2C7E:9A00:743E:E2E7:301F:5D77 in topic Ettingshausen effect is not a synonyme for the second Nernst–Ettingshausen effect

The article could still use a list of some typical Nernst coefficients for frequently-encountered materials, but I will now get back to work. Y!qtr9f 10:38, 7 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Whoever knows more about this: This article linked to Ettingshausen effect, which was (at the time) redlinked. But there was also already an article called Ettinghausen effect (note the missing "s"). Google search showed roughly the same count for each search term, and I don't know which spelling is the correct one. I have redirected the former link to the latter article. Fix this if you know the right spelling. – sgeureka tc 10:14, 29 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Ettingshausen effect is not a synonyme for the second Nernst–Ettingshausen effect

edit

The inverse of the first Nernst–Ettingshausen effect ist indeed the Ettingshausen effect, but the Ettingshausen effect is not a synonyme for the second Nernst–Ettingshausen effect. The latter one is similar to the first Nernst–Ettingshausen, but the temparatur gradient is parallel to the electrical field. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:16B8:2C7E:9A00:743E:E2E7:301F:5D77 (talk) 22:54, 9 October 2017 (UTC)Reply