Talk:NetObjects

Tag "Neutral point"

I made some adjustments in formulations and headlines. If you still feel uncomfortable about meeting neutrality standards please elaborate. --Peter Eisenburger 11:12, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

In a third round of editing I did further streamlining to the article. Please leave comments here if you still think the tone is inappropriate to Wikipedia's. --Peter Eisenburger 07:38, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

So far it seems pretty good. I'll remove the template. oTHErONE _(Contribs) 01:16, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

References

Regarding the concern that has been expressed about the external links section I will incorporate them (or at least most of them) into a new section "references" that I will create.--Peter Eisenburger 14:42, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Article Tone and Style

The article is written more like a magazine article than an encyclopedic article, and includes irrelevant levels of detail in some parts. The article would benefit from a round of editting to cull many of the sections. I'll take a stab later. --HighKing (talk) 12:53, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

I don't agree with some of your edits as I wrote on your talk page and will assess them one by one. What may be "irrelevant", "trivial" and too "detailed" to you, may well be informative for others. --Peter Eisenburger (talk) 06:54, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

I note you "brought back" Sal - but this is one of the edits I disagreed with. Why is Sal notable? Also, if he was notable in his own right, shouldn't he also have an article? It is this level of detail that I believe isn't good for the article - I'd draw the line in a different place for inclusion. --HighKing (talk) 20:08, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

You mean you would only mention people who are so "notable" that they would "earn" an own article after the Wikipedia notability guidelines? Also these criteria for other details of an article? Then you would have to trim down a lot of Wikipedia articles to the bare bones and make them ever so boring.

For instance look at yesterday's article of the day. How many superfluous details has it you would delete? And isn't it much too long? It seems, my understanding of encyclopedic work differs in many (not all) points from yours.

You may have noticed that I didn't touch your deletion of the other key people - though this was knowledge that's buried in the article's history now.--Peter Eisenburger (talk) 05:39, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on NetObjects. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927032744/http://www.clementmok.com/onrecord/article.asp?ArticleID=21&d=1990 to http://www.clementmok.com/onrecord/article.asp?ArticleID=21&d=1990
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://builder.cnet.com/webbuilding/pages/Business/Innovators97/ss03.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.serena.com/products/collage/index.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://globalarchive.ft.com/globalarchive/article.html?id=010620001434&query=samir+arora
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://home.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2674069,00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:08, 16 February 2018 (UTC)