Talk:NetSurf

Internet Low‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing: Software / RISC OS / Free and open-source software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is within the scope of the RISC OS task force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Low-importance).

Disclosure of involvment with the NetSurf project

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

In the interests of WP:COI and as a primary contributor to this article, I should mention that I have made minor contributions to the NetSurf project, and I'm in regular contact with other NetSurf developers. Hertzsprung (talk) 13:16, 8 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

As a regular fiddler with the article, I should also mention that I contribute to the NetSurf project. Tlsa (talk) 13:24, 8 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Use of {{Italic title}}

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

This edit has been queried. My reasoning for making it was to bring this article in line with the convention adopted for other RISC OS software articles. Please note the discussion at WT:COMP. --trevj (talk) 14:02, 16 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Edit now reverted. Sorry for the confusion. --trevj (talk) 19:11, 16 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Historical details in 'Ports' section

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for the identification and correction of my error. Sorry for that - I obviously didn't read the TIB piece very carefully. Also, I'm sure it's not the case that this section must include historical details that came to nothing... the details can be removed again but I just consider it relevant to readers that the RO has been put at risk. Cheers and Merry Christmas. -- Trevj (talk) 08:59, 28 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (February 2018)

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 19 external links on NetSurf. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:18, 16 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Windows version is only a test version.

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Such an important fact should be added to the article. NetSurf's download page for Windows says: The Windows build is a technology demonstrator and is not ready for general use. 2600:1702:3790:1520:CD64:E4C6:1968:5630 (talk) 21:59, 25 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

History section, version history table

Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I attempted to make the #History section more concise and organized by adding a table of releases. I'm not very familiar with this project or with the development of web browsers, but it would seem to me that some of the content in #History is not very notable/describes minor changes- perhaps it would suffice to mark minor versions/bugfixes as such in the table, instead of devoting a list item to each one. I'm not sure how to decide which versions are minor, but I noted the changes that seemed significant to me in my first iteration of this table. Jan kala kabinet (talk) 15:03, 4 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic