Talk:Net bias
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The contents of the Data discrimination page were merged into Net bias on 28 July 2018. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Merge data discrimination here
editthis is a much better starting point article to merge data discrimination into. plus too many people think data discrimination is when someone who has collected data on a person uses that data in a discriminatory fashion against them. Upstatelee18 (talk) 05:00, 19 November 2016 (UTC)Given that it is under related topics with human discrimination being the basis, that reinforces the computer packet discrimination should be under net bias or data bias and data discrimination be used as an article talking about data being used against humans. Upstatelee18 (talk) 05:06, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Yes, they should be merged. Some topics and themes should be shifted to Censorship, too. Zezen (talk) 05:20, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
Change title from "net bias"
editCurrently the title of this article is "net bias". However, this title might not be best. Among the sources which this article cites, few use the term "net bias". The sources have in common that they talk about lack of net neutrality, but there is no particular popular term for describing that concept. "Net neutrality" is a popular term, so the sources just talk about what it means for net neutrality to be absent.
The layout of this article might not be effective as it is. The lead says, "Net bias (or network bias) is the counter-principle to net neutrality", and I feel that most of the article describes net neutrality then suggests imagining the opposite. If we changed the title here then perhaps we could focus more on a specific other topic than a variation of net neutrality.
For example, the title could be "Barriers to net neutrality", then the emphasis could be on the practices in the "models of net bias" section. I find that the "motivations" section and the "discrimination" sections are variations on discussions which people have about net neutrality.
I thought I would post here with the idea and see if others have feedback. Blue Rasberry (talk) 22:19, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Net bias. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20130131025902/http://servicetiers.openet.com/the-problem.html to http://servicetiers.openet.com/the-problem.html
- Added archive https://archive.is/20130130201901/http://servicetiers.openet.com/the-solution.html to http://servicetiers.openet.com/the-solution.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120713060708/http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/13--The-Audience-for-Online-VideoSharing-Sites-Shoots-Up/3-Mobile-and-TV-Viewing/Americans-who-have-cut-back-on-expenses-are-more-likely-to-watch-online-video-on-their-televisions.aspx to http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/13--The-Audience-for-Online-VideoSharing-Sites-Shoots-Up/3-Mobile-and-TV-Viewing/Americans-who-have-cut-back-on-expenses-are-more-likely-to-watch-online-video-on-their-televisions.aspx
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120314003726/http://www.freepress.net/news/14959 to http://www.freepress.net/news/14959
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:31, 16 February 2018 (UTC)