Talk:Netherlands Antilles at the 1992 Winter Olympics
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Kosack in topic GA Review
Netherlands Antilles at the 1992 Winter Olympics has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: October 22, 2018. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Netherlands Antilles at the 1992 Winter Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Kosack (talk · contribs) 20:39, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
I'll have a look at this one, will post review as soon as possible. Kosack (talk) 20:39, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
Initial review
Lead
edit- Unlink France. Per WP:OVERLINK, linking countries is discouraged unless there is real significance.
- Could perhaps briefly explain why this was the Antilles' final appearance.
- Albert Carpentier Alting is a redirect. Pipe the link if you wish to use his full name.
Background
edit- Albert Carpentier Alting is a redirect here also.
Bobsleigh
edit- Unlink Alting and den Dulk, both linked in the previous section.
- Alting uses Bart here but Albert in the previous two mentions.
- I'm viewing on mobile but, there seems to be a slightly excessive amount of space between the text and the table.
References
edit- Ref 9 needs an accessdate. Maybe I'm missing it but, I'm not sure where the date field comes from either.
- Neither am I, I was using my alt to write this on a browser with no spellcheck and very different citation fillin scripts than I'm used to! Courcelles (talk) 01:17, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
- Date formats are quite varied, for example most of the archive dates are YYYY-MM--DD but the access dates are different. Maintain one style for consistency.
I fixed two small typos alongside incase you wish to check. A couple of small issues here, placed on hold for now. Kosack (talk) 20:53, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks. Think I fixed the date formats, though consistency of date formats isn't really a GA requirement, either. Everything else taken care of, thanks for the review! Courcelles (talk) 01:20, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
- Happy to promote. Kosack (talk) 09:15, 22 October 2018 (UTC)