Talk:Netlink

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Netlink article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Linux Low‑importance

	Linux portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linux, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Linux on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinuxWikipedia:WikiProject LinuxTemplate:WikiProject LinuxLinux articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing: Networking Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Networking task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Unnamed section

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I'm interested in getting the Netlink documentation up to date. As anyone who writes Netlink code knows, the documentation is sparse. My limitations is that I work for an operating system company, so looking at Linux kernel source is not an option. Would any other Netlink developers be able to contribute here? ThomasCantrell 18:31, 4 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Article quality is quite low for wikipedia. It does not answer question what is Netlink. First sentence begins "Netlink is used to ...". It answers WHAT NETLINK DOES, however it does not answer WHAT IT IS. 79.75.140.20 01:13, 5 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

The font changes are excessive. Poor writing, needs more style/font work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheseDitoRS (talk • contribs) 22:45, 17 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Errors

The first link in the "External Links" section ("Communicating between the kernel and user-space in Linux using Netlink sockets") appears to be broken. Searching for the title reveals alternate copies available online.

External links modified (January 2018)

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Netlink. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110902031641/http://1984.lsi.us.es/~pablo/docs/spae.pdf to http://1984.lsi.us.es/~pablo/docs/spae.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:54, 19 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic