Talk:Neuromantic (philosophy)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Continental philosophy

Anyone

Latest comment: 6 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

Does anyone other than me even noticed this page? Watto the jazzman 06:09, 3 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have beheld it, and lo, it was good. - Zelaron (talk) 12:03, 16 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

It's all right I guess.Greg Bard (talk) 21:53, 4 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

I have attempted to expand this article but I really had difficulty finding sources that cite or discuss it. Even Shore's description of the concept is not very detailed and, as he said, "intimately related" to Heidegger's own concept of Gestell (cited in his book as Bestellen^[1]). There was also a lack of examples. Darwin Naz (talk) 13:12, 16 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

References

^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuromantic_(philosophy)#cite_note-:0-1

Add topic

[1] ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuromantic_(philosophy)#cite_note-:0-1

[1]