Talk:Neutral spine

Spinal evaluation programs are US specific

Shouldn't the links be to objective evaluations of posture instead of particular commercial products, as well as reference to "is warranted" -- by whom.

Posture assessment has also become quite popular in many practical environments like the personal training and sports conditioning settings. The need for reliable methods of posture assessment as a screening tool is warranted. Current available programs such as those through the National Posture Institute (NPI) and Posture Print are recommended for the practical setting but cost close to $1000 and may not be feasible for all practitioners. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Satsuke (talk • contribs) 15:44, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

The current text discussing the National Posture Institute makes no sense. The text says it is "clearly a profiteering scam by individuals not at all concerned with human well-being" but "clearly" is subjective, and it is not clear to me that a program is a profiteering scam simply because it is very expensive. I don't think there is a basis for inferring that the owners don't care about well-being. If there is such a basis, it requires citation. If it is a scam, the sentence is contradictory, because the text says the programs are recommended for the practical setting, when a scam should probably not be recommended. Sightvision (talk) 11:06, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

That passage clearly does not belong in Wikipedia as written, and I have removed it. A better account of these issues would be welcome. Looie496 (talk) 16:31, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

"Lombar"

Is that not a typo? Mac Dreamstate (talk) 13:40, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Neutral spine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070822175323/http://www.wellbridge.com/wellbridge/cambridge/pulse.php?ID=9 to http://www.wellbridge.com/wellbridge/cambridge/pulse.php?ID=9

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:53, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Proposed merge of Poor posture with Neutral spine

See discussion at WT:MED (t · c) buidhe 16:34, 13 October 2022 (UTC)