Talk:Neville McNamara/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Binksternet (talk) 14:33, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

What a pleasure it is to review this neatly written article! I corrected a tiny hyphen-used-as-en-dash mistake, and I note that though its presence here is fully within WP guidelines, the color photo of McNamara has been inserted into other articles without suitable fair use rationale.

Many tks for your review and comments, Binksternet. Yes, I don't know that this picture can really qualify for fair use in some of those other articles, though that doesn't affect it here since it does have a proper rationale, as you point out. I'm actually in the process of requesting a release under the GNU free licence for this and other CAS images held by the RAAF, so we'll see where that goes... Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 22:37, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

• Action item: cite the quoted bit "an invaluable learning experience for the top job". After that, GA time! Binksternet (talk) 18:34, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
  • Done, had a citation in the wrong spot. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 22:37, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
    • No barney, it's GA time. ^_^ Binksternet (talk) 03:15, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
      • Tks mate! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 03:22, 16 April 2010 (UTC)