Talk:Nevus sebaceous
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Nevus sebaceous.
|
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Article categorization
editThis article was initially categorized based on scheme outlined at WP:DERM:CAT. kilbad (talk) 05:58, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Name of entry is incorrect
editSomeone please change the name of the entry to Nevus Sebaceus; Nevus Sebaceous is a common mis-spelling. Look at a medical dictionary or ask someone who knows Latin if you need verification.
Latin: Nevus sebaceus; American English: Sebaceous nevus; British English: Sebaceous naevus
Requested move 30 April 2015
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Number 57 11:44, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Nevus sebaceous → Nevus sebaceus – The article is currently misnamed with a combination of the Latin and English names; it should either be "Nevus sebaceus" or "Sebaceous nevus". The current title is incorrect in both languages. --Relisted. George Ho (talk) 19:13, 7 May 2015 (UTC) Pinnerup (talk) 16:03, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
- I would prefer "Sebaceous nevus" as it is the English spelling, but would also be happy if the Latin spelling were to be corrected. --Tom (LT) (talk) 14:28, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
- Comment current name gets more google hits — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.120.162.73 (talk) 20:37, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
- Web search results are likely to be influenced by Wikipedias prominence. Here's an illustrative Google Ngram showing that the most common terms in printed literature are "nevus sebaceus" and "sebaceous nevus" (the two grammatically consistent terms) followed by "nevus sebaceous" in third place. --Pinnerup (talk) 16:40, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Feel that sebaceous be kept - several other articles use this and see no reason to confuse things. Since there is also a page sebaceous nevus syndrome seems sensible to rename to sebaceous nevus.--Iztwoz (talk) 21:38, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.