Talk:New Jersey Route 19

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Juliancolton in topic GA Review
Good articleNew Jersey Route 19 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 23, 2009Good article nomineeListed

Assessment

edit

Nice job. Needs more though.

  1. Sourcing
  2. Major junctions
  3. and whatever you can think of.Mitchazenia(7600+edits) 20:08, 18 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:New Jersey Route 19/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
  • Lead is currently a bit too long; for an article of this length, the lead should be one moderately sized paragraph or two small paragraphs.
  • Route 19 is sometimes called the Paterson Peripheral. - Doesn't really fit in well with the surrounding text.
  • Route 19 begins at the intersection of County Route 509 (Broad Street) and County Route 609 (Colfax Avenue) in Clifton, and heads north along with County Route 509 as a four-lane divided highway with a 35 mph (56 km/h) speed limit. - Could be a bit confusing to those unfamiliar with highway terminology; is there a way you could fit in a link to concurrency (road)?
  • The route passes some businesses before interchanging with U.S. Route 46. - First part of this sentence is trivial at best, indiscriminate at worst.
  • Are you sure reference #3 lists the correct publisher?
  • A couple more non-map sources would be good, if possible.

Looks good other than that. Placing this on-hold for now, but these issues should be easy to address. –Juliancolton | Talk 01:40, 23 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the review. I have replied to the above comments. As for the pulisher in reference #3, it is correct. Dough4872 (talk) 15:05, 23 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
 Y Looks good. –Juliancolton | Talk 15:16, 23 July 2009 (UTC)Reply