Talk:New Jersey Route 23

Assessment

Nice job. Needs more though. Very close to a B-Class, just add some info. Mitchazenia(7600+edits) 20:13, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:New Jersey Route 23/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Some comments:

1. Again, too many technical facts for the Route description.
2. I question if 94 and 284 are major junctions.
3. I-287 exit 52 should be "Exit 52 (I-287)".
4. Spell out Alt
5. In Major intersections, colors are missing
6. In Major intersections, get rid of what's overlapping when its one road.
7. get rid of "New York State line"
8. lowercase the title of Reference 8.
9. More pics would help.

On hold for now.Mitch32^{(Go Syracuse)} 00:52, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

I have gone back and made some changes to the article. As for the route description, I do not see how there are too many technical facts as I do mention the many environments the route passes through. Dough4872 (talk) 03:11, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

I have fixed the route description Dough4872 (talk) 01:34, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on New Jersey Route 23. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071031111034/http://www.jimmyandsharonwilliams.com/njroads/1920s/images/1927_routes.gif to http://www.jimmyandsharonwilliams.com/njroads/1920s/images/1927_routes.gif

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:54, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Ghost bridge

"'Ghost bridge' submerged for more than a century in North Jersey is exposed" This carried the Paterson-Hamburg Turnpike, which is noted in the article as a predecessor to 23, so it might be worth a mention. Mapsax (talk) 01:48, 20 November 2024 (UTC)