Talk:New Jersey Route 48/GA1

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Admiral Norton in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
  • "It is a two-lane, undivided road its entire length that intersects with Interstate 295 and County Route 551." — change to "through its entire length" or "in its entire length". I'm not sure which is more correct, but this doesn't sound well.
  • "It was moved off portions of the Route 48 alignment twice..." — reword, sounds a bit weird.
  • Un-bold the road designations in "History" per MOS:BOLD.
  • Can you please point out how are refs 4 and 6 reliable sources? Admiral Norton (talk) 16:41, 5 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
I have gone back and made changes to the article. As for the bolded road designations, they are that way because they are redirects to the article. As for the sources, a previous discussion at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard states these sources seem to be okay to use. Dough4872 (talk) 02:04, 6 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
Good enough for me. I'm promoting this article. Admiral Norton (talk) 16:53, 6 March 2009 (UTC)Reply