Talk:New Jersey Route 48/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

• "It is a two-lane, undivided road its entire length that intersects with Interstate 295 and County Route 551." — change to "through its entire length" or "in its entire length". I'm not sure which is more correct, but this doesn't sound well.
• "It was moved off portions of the Route 48 alignment twice..." — reword, sounds a bit weird.
• Un-bold the road designations in "History" per MOS:BOLD.
• Can you please point out how are refs 4 and 6 reliable sources? Admiral Norton ^(talk) 16:41, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

I have gone back and made changes to the article. As for the bolded road designations, they are that way because they are redirects to the article. As for the sources, a previous discussion at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard states these sources seem to be okay to use. Dough4872 (talk) 02:04, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Good enough for me. I'm promoting this article. Admiral Norton ^(talk) 16:53, 6 March 2009 (UTC)