Talk:New Mexico State Ethics Commission

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 20 April 2020 by reviewer Sulfurboy (talk · contribs).

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

NMSEC (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.

Deletions

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The past two deletions by this editor do not seem sensible, nor will they respond to my messages. Here is the most recent one .. of course mdy is appropriate, yet they deleted it. Pinging user:Fastily, who has interacted w this editor. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=New_Mexico_State_Ethics_Commission&diff=prev&oldid=1151436031 2603:7000:2101:AA00:B504:AB5D:DC04:2FA1 (talk) 03:54, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

I have self-reverted my edit removing the "mdy dates" template. That was an error on my part. In the future, please leave an accurate edit summary and avoid something deceptive/generic like ce when you are not making a copyedit (see WP:SUMMARYNO). I am not reverting my other edit. There is no reason to include a link to the Florida Commission on Ethics in the "see also" section when there is already a link to Ethics commission, which links many state ethics commissions. Florida and New Mexico do not have a special link, as far as I can see. If Fastily ever does show up, I urge them to take a look at the page's edit history and evaluate why two brand-new IPs have such a firm grasp on Wiki rules and policies. Thanks. Novemberjazz 14:03, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Date format falls within copy edits. Why is it that you believe that the edit summary was "deceptive"? It is not a substantive edit. As to the see also issue, please see the MOS on see also's. This fits. As to IPs .. many, as mine, due to the service provider, change IPs on their own. What innappropriate matter do you imagine in your reference to a grasp on WP policies? And what is the tempest in a teapot for here? How is this a contentious issue that calls for assumptions of bad faith?--2603:7000:2101:AA00:84AB:E9D:89DC:474E (talk) 14:55, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic