Talk:New Mexico meridian

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (February 2018)

I am a little confused. There are/were two NM principal meridians that have been used. As far as I can tell the one listed in the article, 106 53' 40", is no longer used. I have an old map that uses 106 53' 40", as written in the article, but my 1917 map is the same age as reference 1 (1914).

The BLM has this one: 106 53' 12" (http://www.blm.gov/cadastral/meridians/newmexico.htm) .

I don't know the history but according to wikipedia the Greenwich prime meridian has been within 5" of the same spot since Airy (1841). It would be nice to sort this out and mention it explicitly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.254.150.101 (talk) 13:13, 9 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on New Mexico meridian. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:11, 17 February 2018 (UTC)Reply