Talk:New York Giants (disambiguation)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the New York Giants (disambiguation) page. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
(Madagascar)
editI'd like to suggest removing the pop culture reference in Madagascar. That belongs in the Pop Culture section of one of the main articles or in the Madagascar article itself. It's certainly not what people are looking for when they search for the New York Giants and does not belong on this disambiguation page. Bigmantonyd (talk) 22:50, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
- Indeed. In fact, the lack of mention in the film's article, and apparent lack of any red lk reflecting that usage, make the entry contrary to MoSDab. Removing.
--Jerzy•t 03:06, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
MLB refs
editThe references to Major League Baseball do nothing to contribute to Dab'n of "New York Giants". In fact, it is used twice to describe teams that arose prior to the creation of the National Commission in 1903, which the holder of the trademark "Major League Baseball" apparently regards as the point when major league baseball went from being something without a clear definition to something with a single meaning and therefore even retrospectively describable with a capitalized title. (One of the two died before MLB claims to have been born!)
--Jerzy•t 05:37, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Soccer teams
editThe sports team topics are now a ToC-entry section, but its subdivisions should not full-fledged sections. Instead, baseball (2 entries) and soccer (3) now have plain-text headings. "Soccer teams" also has an anchor, which is needed as a target for the Rdr that replaces the former multi-topic article New York Giants (soccer) -- which had all the faults of the deprecated multi-stub article scheme, plus covering two topics in sufficient bulk to deserve their own articles even if you like multi-stubs, and duplicating coverage of those two's existing articles.
--Jerzy•t 07:26, 1 November 2009 (UTC)