Talk:New York State Route 117

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Tomobe03 in topic GA Review
Good articleNew York State Route 117 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 14, 2012Good article nomineeListed
July 8, 2015Good article reassessmentKept
Current status: Good article

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:New York State Route 117/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tomobe03 (talk · contribs) 11:53, 13 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

I'll review this article within a day or two.--Tomobe03 (talk) 11:53, 13 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Overall, nice work, prose quality is fine by me. The article seems to be stable, neutral, and fairly comprehensive for a road of this extent and rank, history section is nicely done. All images have appropriate licenses. The entire article is suitably referenced, but there is a reference currently used in the article containing a dead link though. Would it be possible to repair/replace that one?--Tomobe03 (talk) 12:12, 14 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Done. Mitch32(Victim of public education, 17 years and counting) 18:37, 14 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the quick response. All clear now.--Tomobe03 (talk) 23:06, 14 December 2012 (UTC)Reply