Talk:New York State Route 122

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Pzoxicuvybtnrm in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:New York State Route 122/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Pzoxicuvybtnrm (talk · contribs) 02:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    This article is well written and I tried to take care of what minor copy-edit issues I came across.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    The articles is well sourced to a variety of sources, and albeit most of them are maps, they support the information in the article.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    The picture is nice and adds to the article.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    I will pass this article.