Talk:New York State Route 128
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Rschen7754 in topic GA Review
New York State Route 128 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Change of Intersection Template
editThis article was changed to bring its intersection template to the NYint format. No other changes were made. It is important to verify, update and/or correct as necessary.Fwgoebel 22:38, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:New York State Route 128/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: PointsofNoReturn (talk · contribs) 18:36, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
The article needs more citations.
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- The first two paragraphs of the history section need citations.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Sufficient for the route.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Completely unbiased.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edits since January 2014
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
PointsofNoReturn (talk) 18:46, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Considering the reviewer's complete lack of experience, I have put the article back on the queue for another reviewer. --Rschen7754 19:50, 30 March 2014 (UTC)