Talk:New York State Route 146

New York State Route 146 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 1, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed

U.S. Roads: State highways / New York Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Topics

U.S. state highways

Locations

New York

This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.

This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Article recognition:

	This article was the Selected article of the New York Roads Portal in June 2015.

New York (state): Capital District / Hudson Valley

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Capital District (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Hudson Valley (assessed as Low-importance).

New York State Route 912C was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 31 March 2009 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into New York State Route 146. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

NY 146 in Schenectady

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I'm the one who added the NY 156 reference in Altamont; thanks to TMF for his method as I had originally put up a noaccess tag, instead of the "To" banner. Now, for Schenectady: 146 doesn't link to 890 East; it's just a link to the Thruway, as the control of the highway once its ramp merges is within Thruway control. With that I don't think the "West" banner is needed at the next intersection as 890 can only go west from there. Signs in the area don't ever say East 890, and I can check on if there's a "To West" or just a "To" 890 at NY 7's intersection (Curry Road). Further, NY 146 does have a noaccess crossing over I-890 and I have to research whether it's between exits 6 and 7, and what the mile marker should be. Fwgoebel 02:35, 23 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Good article review

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): See above b (MoS): See above notes.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
It is stable.
It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
a (tagged and captioned): b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
Overall:
a Pass/Fail:

Well writen, and an interesting read. I quickly checked out about some stylistic concerns, but they seem to have been explained to me well. Pass. Maxim_(talk) 20:02, 1 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Add topic