Talk:New York State Route 148

New York State Route 148 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 19, 2013. (Reviewed version).

U.S. Roads: State highways / New York Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	U.S. state highways
Locations	New York
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

GA Review

Latest comment: 11 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:New York State Route 148/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cryptic C62 (talk · contribs) 22:41, 30 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

"The concurrent county route number is unsigned, as are all county routes in Niagara County." This information appears in the lead, but not in the body.
The left-alignment of the first image scrunches up the text pretty badly on my monitor. I'd suggest right-aligning it to force it under the infobox. This will also bring it closer to the paragraph about Barker.
Citations look good.
The article is sufficiently well-written and appears to be a comprehensive account.
No problems with neutrality or stability.

-- Cryptic C62 · Talk 22:41, 30 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

@Mitchazenia: - how is this coming along? --Rs chen 7754 07:56, 18 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

I haven't even done anything because since there was no hold that i thought he was not finished. Sigh, hold on. Mitch32^{(Wikipedia's worst Reform Luddite.)} 22:56, 18 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Got the first one. I'm not changing the alignment of the image because right-aligned forces cause huge globs of white space, which is worse. Mitch32^{(Wikipedia's worst Reform Luddite.)} 22:59, 18 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

I disagree. I changed it myself, and now I am content. GAN passed. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 00:56, 19 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic