Talk:New York State Route 3/GA1

GA Review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   Are we okay here with using "interchange" as a verb? I never have, but I'm not about to say no one else can.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Consider adding an image of the historical alignment and adding it into the History section for bonus FA points.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Thorough, and with comparatively good prose (considering I've read a lot of articles in the past 3 days) to boot. Congrats! —Rob (talk) 22:17, 3 July 2008 (UTC)