Talk:New York State Route 318

New York State Route 318 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 29, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed

U.S. Roads: State highways / New York Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Topics

U.S. state highways

Locations

New York

This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.

This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Article recognition:

	This article was the Selected article of the New York Roads Portal in August 2012.

Shunpiking

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Isn't the info given here common sense? Also, I don't see how "destined for Waterloo, Clyde, Seneca Falls, or the shopping center" is original research. The road heads directly to two of the locations (one, the shopping center, is on 318) and, via NY 414, leads to the other two. --TMF ^{Let's Go Mets - Stats} 17:55, 10 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:New York State Route 318/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
Prose is actually pretty good. Could always use some brushing-up, though. However, the lead needs to be expanded.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Seems like 10 miles should have more RD.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Nice images, good captions.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Pretty good article here. Just expand the lead and check if there's any more RD and you should be good-to-go. Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 17:53, 29 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Everything's been fixed, passes GA. 18:16, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Add topic